Comparing arts and science

The unveiling of many things such as technology and medicine deduct from the oldest whole kit and caboodle of intuition. It is obligatory to have a general understanding of this simplyt to have a greater understanding of a finer field of honor of science. On the other hand, in belles-lettres, in that respect is no prior foundation knowledge removeed to comprehend the newest and oldest works. Even though this is true, by record, in belles-lettres, closely the time, one leave alone like guide cured works. This is not constantly true, though, at times some whitethorn to prefer the newest. In science, virtually the time, one will shew newest works graduation but not constantly.To that end, I agree with avocation quote from Baron Lytton in most cases In science, read, by resource, the newest works in literature, the oldest. there ar some cases where one whitethorn prefer to read newer works of literature and there argon cases where one may prefer to read former(a) works but in most cases in literature, read, by preference, the newest works. The following three examples illustrate where in literature one may or may not prefer to read newer or older works. The first example in literature is drama. In drama it depends weather you are trying to read to educate yourself or if you are reading/ aftermath for pleaser.In the first case you may want to educate yourself with older works first. In the second case you may want to read newer works for pleasure. The second example in literature is poetry. In poetry ones preference is open to choose any type of work. Poetry is unfailing and because of this there is no incentive to read older or newer works. In this case the preference in neutral. The last example in literature is a novel. Most people prefer to read older works when it comes to novels. Most people read older novels because it is established work and has a high level of credibility.The oldest work is recognized and most people pr efer to read it over newer works. With this being said, overall, in literature, one prefers to read the oldest works. This is most probably true because it is a generational thing where the work is passed pop out from one generation to another and there is no desire or necessity for change. Similarly, in science, there are some cases where one may prefer to read newer works and there are cases where one may prefer to read older works. This first case where is it is usually necessary to read the oldest works in science is in theoretical, psychological and favorable science.The next couple examples illustrate where one will prefer to read oldest works. The first example is in the biological fields such as medical and pharmaceutical. In order to practice or study each of these fields you must read and understand the foundation science arsehole it. If someone wants to have a good understanding of this field they need to read the older works. They must gain this understanding first and so they may work towards newer works. Similarly, another example is the study of matter, energy, and space.If you are pass to read about this subject matter you will most likely prefer to read the oldest works first and then move to the newer works. To knead advances in this field a soul must have a good understanding of the foundation science. In contrast, when it comes to practical science, it is usually prefer to read the newest works in science. There are a few examples the help demonstrate where in practical or applied science one may prefer to read the newest works. The first example is in medicine and surgery here the preference is to read the newest so the person fucking use the latest science available to them.They also prefer to read the newest works so that can make further advances in the field. Similarly, in technological and business processes, one will read the newest works so they can apply them to their every day operations. As it is illustrated, in scienc e, it may be preferred to read oldest works or it may be preferred to read newest works but in most cases the latter is preferred. In science, since we have the required foundation knowledge our preferences are forced. We are required and must read some of the oldest works first.thence after gaining that preliminary knowledge, one may prefer to read the newest works instead of older. To compare this with literature this is quite contrary. In literature there is no foundation level required. This implies there is no forced preference to read older or newer works. One may choose to read the oldest works but this is not always true. There tends to be slight of a preference overall for literature comparatively sometimes it makes nose out to read older sometimes newer if often depends on type. In conclusion, I agree to an extent that In science, read, by preference, the newest works in literature, the oldest.There is a certain scale and balance that exists when observing ones preferenc e. The scale tilts profuse to the for me to say that I agree with it even though it is not always true. There is always going to be new literature and there is always going to be new works in science. No matter what works come out in the future it can be assumed that this trend will continue. People will always tend to prefer to read older literature and people will always prefer to read newer works of science. This tends to be built into peoples nature and it uncontrollable.